Skip to main content

Eliminate the 50-50 Sidewalk Program

From "Share Your Policy Ideas"

Go to the project

St. Louis needs to eliminate the outdated 50/50 sidewalk program and create a comprehensive, citywide plan to repair hazardous sidewalks, rebuild deficient ones, and construct sidewalks where they’re missing.

The 50/50 sidewalk program is inequitable and ineffective:

  • Neglected neighborhoods: Landlords rarely invest in repairs, and vacant properties often have no one to hold accountable. Even city-owned lots through the LRA have been ignored for decades.
  • Transportation inequities: The worst sidewalks overlap with areas of lowest car ownership, forcing people into the street and creating serious safety hazards. At least one pedestrian in the city died this year because there was no safe sidewalk.
  • Legal liability: The ADA requires accessible sidewalks. St. Louis’ own ADA transition plan calls for more repairs than the current system allows. Every dangerous sidewalk reported to the city is potential notice of liability when injuries occur.

Other cities like Kansas City and Denver have already recognized this inequity and shifted to citywide sidewalk responsibility. St. Louis can do the same. With our top geospatial talent and the community mapping work of Project Sidewalk, we can identify the highest-need areas and prioritize investments based on equity, Safe Routes to Schools, transit access, and job connections.

Sidewalks are basic infrastructure just like streets. They are essential to walkable neighborhoods, a complete transportation system, and the City’s Vision Zero commitment to eliminate traffic deaths. Safe, accessible sidewalks are a right, not a privilege. It’s time St. Louis took responsibility for them.

Comments(10)

Commenting is not possible because this project is currently not active.
Most recent comments have loaded.
I agree, the city needs to be responsible for the sidewalks. And two queues will never work - if they’re years behind now, they’ll never get to any where property owners aren’t paying half. I’m sure we can find a way to fund the city taking 100% responsibility.
  • 1 like
I completely agree that the city should take 100% responsibility for sidewalks, but, if a resident is willing to pay 50% of the cost why would you eliminate that ? The current problem with the 50/50 program us that the wait time is 6-7 years. We have been on the list for 4 years now so have 2-3 more years to go. Do we really think that if the city was picking up the full tab it would get done quicker ?
    @bryan-davidsonAre you proposing the City maintain two queues - one for those able to pay and one for those who can't?
      @Cristina Garmendia Good question. I think 2 queues could work. That way you would still stretch city money further from homeowners who are willing to pay 50% while also providing support to homeowners@Cristina Garmendia Good question. I think 2 queues could work. That way you would still stretch city money further from homeowners who are willing to pay the 50% while also providing support to homeowners that are not.
        Profile of Hope Wyss
        Posted by:Hope Wyss
        6 months ago
        @Bryan Davidson our current system clearly doesn’t work. I’ve lived in other cities where there was a 50/50 city:homeowner responsibility and even 100% homeowner responsibility. The result has been the same, no maintenance. Sidewalks are a still part of having a walkable city that meets the needs of everyone. The issues I see here is the lack of city revenue to pay for infrastructure. With our continued loss of population, there’s less revenue. The conundrum is that to attract people to live in the city, we need to address our crumbling infrastructure to make the Coty look more attractive. STL has so much to offer. We need to find creative ways to make our City better so people want to live here.
        • 2 likes
        This program is extremely unfair in that the city plants the trees that tear up the sidewalks and will not remove them when residents say they do not want them but will have to pay half the repair cost associated with root damage to the sidewalk from a city tree.
        • 1 like
        Thank you for this. Our sidewalks are embarrassing and unsafe and not ADA compliant. Soulard and Benton Park are actually walkable neighborhoods in the City with terrible sidewalks. I don't blame citizens for not paying half, it's not their responsibility. The City should be 100% responsible.
        • 3 likes
        Great points, Julie. Can you tell us more about Project Sidewalk?
        • 2 likes
        @Cristina Garmendia Project Sidewalk is kind of a crowdsourced platform where users can document accessibility challenges they see using streetviews, while other users fact-check the severity of the accessibility. Users can document things from utility plates, sidewalk tilt, obstructions, missing sidewalks, vegetation issues, and more. While the method might seem a little shaky, the data supports how successful it is: https://makeabilitylab.cs.washington.edu/project/sidewalk/ The best part is how open-source the outputs are, so you can pull data and map it. https://github.com/ProjectSidewalk/SidewalkWebpage/wiki/Making-your-own-visualization-of-Project-Sidewalk-data St. Louis launched theirs a while back with a test ward and at 100% completion more wards were added. About 25% of the city is mapped now. I believe Ald. Browning's staff was in some of the presentations as well but it's pretty neat to try and having walked areas after I mapped them, I was pleasantly surprised with just how accurate my reports were to the lived experience.
        • 6 likes
        Profile of Malik L
        Posted by:Malik L
        9 months ago
        I completely agree. This should be one of the most basic reforms to city government, and it would be worth the investment. Improving sidewalks would not only make the city more accessible, but it would immediately make neighborhoods more appealing.
        • 4 likes

        Share

        Posted by

        Current status

        proposed

        Tags

        Transportation & Commerce
        Public Infrastructure & Utilities